https://smarttan.com/blog/index.php/acs-melanoma-incidence-%e2%80%98stable%e2%80%99-5/
The American Cancer Society’s key document measuring cancer rates in the United States — “Cancer Facts and Figures” — says that melanoma rates have not increased since 2000 and that rates are declining for women under age 50 — directly contradicting what ACS lobbyists have testified to state legislative panels this year.
“During the 1970’s, the incidence rate of melanoma increased rapidly by about 6 percent per year. However, from 1981-2000, the rate of increase slowed to 3 percent per year and since 2000 melanoma incidence has been stable,” the ACS “Cancer Facts and Figures 2008” reports. “The death rate for melanoma has been decreasing rapidly in whites younger than 50, by 3 percent per year since 1991 in men and by 2.3 percent per year since 1985 in women.”
ACS lobbyists — calling for legislation to further restrict teenage usage of indoor tanning — have falsely testified that melanoma rates are increasing in young women.
“Dermatology’s contention that melanoma is increasing in young women is totally anecdotal — it amounts to nothing more than cosmetic doctors saying that they see more young women,” Smart Tan Vice President Joseph Levy said. “But they see more young women because that’s who they market all their cosmetic services to. It’s well-documented that dermatology has always had an extremely high percentage of young female clients compared to every other medical discipline.”
The National Cancer Institute’s charts show that melanoma is increasing rapidly in men over age 50, but is on the decline in women under 50. “Yet no public health campaigns are directed at men,” Levy said.
Five salons around Atlanta! Offering UV tanning, UV-free Mystic and Airbrush, red light therapy and lotions. Call 866-970-TANS to contact us directly!
Sunday, February 27, 2011
New Study: Vitamin D supplements not enough, UV exposure needed
https://smarttan.com/blog/index.php/new-study-9600-iu-%e2%80%98d%e2%80%99-needed/
Authors of a peer-reviewed study generated from the world’s largest database of vitamin D blood tests say that 9,600 IU of vitamin D — an amount only naturally consistent with vitamin D production from regular sun exposure — is needed daily to get virtually all of the population up to 40 ng/ml vitamin D blood levels – the level targeted by the world’s leading vitamin D researchers as minimal.
Published this week in the journal Anticancer Research, researchers from the University of California-San Diego, Creighton University and GrassRoots Health – a California-based public health organization that has collected vitamin D data since 2008 – point out that the level is well below levels found to present any risk of vitamin D toxicity and is naturally consistent with what outdoor workers get from UVB exposure to their skin.
“Although an order of magnitude higher than current recommended oral intakes, these calculated daily intakes are of the same magnitude as produced by a single, minimal erythemal dose of UVB radiation, such as would be obtained during a few minutes of solar UVB exposure near noon in midsummer, assuming nearly complete skin exposure,” the authors wrote.
Complete skin exposure – in a bathing suit – means 90 percent of skin surface is getting sunlight. It has been estimated that indoor tanners in most tanning equipment make around 1,000 IU of vitamin D per minute.
The authors believe this study is the first analysis of the relation of vitamin D status to vitamin D supplementation as practiced in the community. More than 3,600 subjects took part in the study.
While 9,600 IU is 16 times what the government – based solely on bone health – believes people need daily, vitamin D researchers point to thousands of studies showing that vitamin D regulates cell growth and other functions at levels significantly higher than what are needed for bone health. Grassroots Health recommends vitamin D blood levels between 40-60 ng/ml based on that belief and a worldwide consortium (D-Action) of 35 vitamin D scientists supports that conclusion.
Indoor tanning clients, according to independent research, have average vitamin D blood levels higher than 40 ng/ml — about 90 percent higher than levels found in the non-tanning population.
To read the Anticancer Research study click here.
Authors of a peer-reviewed study generated from the world’s largest database of vitamin D blood tests say that 9,600 IU of vitamin D — an amount only naturally consistent with vitamin D production from regular sun exposure — is needed daily to get virtually all of the population up to 40 ng/ml vitamin D blood levels – the level targeted by the world’s leading vitamin D researchers as minimal.
Published this week in the journal Anticancer Research, researchers from the University of California-San Diego, Creighton University and GrassRoots Health – a California-based public health organization that has collected vitamin D data since 2008 – point out that the level is well below levels found to present any risk of vitamin D toxicity and is naturally consistent with what outdoor workers get from UVB exposure to their skin.
“Although an order of magnitude higher than current recommended oral intakes, these calculated daily intakes are of the same magnitude as produced by a single, minimal erythemal dose of UVB radiation, such as would be obtained during a few minutes of solar UVB exposure near noon in midsummer, assuming nearly complete skin exposure,” the authors wrote.
Complete skin exposure – in a bathing suit – means 90 percent of skin surface is getting sunlight. It has been estimated that indoor tanners in most tanning equipment make around 1,000 IU of vitamin D per minute.
The authors believe this study is the first analysis of the relation of vitamin D status to vitamin D supplementation as practiced in the community. More than 3,600 subjects took part in the study.
While 9,600 IU is 16 times what the government – based solely on bone health – believes people need daily, vitamin D researchers point to thousands of studies showing that vitamin D regulates cell growth and other functions at levels significantly higher than what are needed for bone health. Grassroots Health recommends vitamin D blood levels between 40-60 ng/ml based on that belief and a worldwide consortium (D-Action) of 35 vitamin D scientists supports that conclusion.
Indoor tanning clients, according to independent research, have average vitamin D blood levels higher than 40 ng/ml — about 90 percent higher than levels found in the non-tanning population.
To read the Anticancer Research study click here.
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Smoking vs Tanning
https://smarttan.com/blog/index.php/put-smoking-comparison-up-in-smoke/
Thousands of news reports continue to suggest that “sun tanning is as dangerous as tobacco” because UV and cigarettes are both considered carcinogens. But the comparison is a blatant misrepresentation.
1.Smoker’s risk of lung cancer: 15 percent — or 2,000 percent higher than that of non-smokers. Smoking introduces up to 60 man-made known carcinogens into the body — substances the body was never designed to process. Smoking is related to 1 in 3 cancer deaths.
2.Tanner’s risk of melanoma: 0.3 percent — compared to 0.2 percent for non-tanners (a difference of 1 in 1,000) UV is natural and intended — the body needs ultraviolet light to survive. Simply calling it a carcinogen without that caveat is totally misleading.
One thing we know for certain: You would be dead today if you did not receive any ultraviolet light.
Thousands of news reports continue to suggest that “sun tanning is as dangerous as tobacco” because UV and cigarettes are both considered carcinogens. But the comparison is a blatant misrepresentation.
1.Smoker’s risk of lung cancer: 15 percent — or 2,000 percent higher than that of non-smokers. Smoking introduces up to 60 man-made known carcinogens into the body — substances the body was never designed to process. Smoking is related to 1 in 3 cancer deaths.
2.Tanner’s risk of melanoma: 0.3 percent — compared to 0.2 percent for non-tanners (a difference of 1 in 1,000) UV is natural and intended — the body needs ultraviolet light to survive. Simply calling it a carcinogen without that caveat is totally misleading.
One thing we know for certain: You would be dead today if you did not receive any ultraviolet light.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Hollywood Tans: Senior Tanologist: Red Light Therapy to the Rescue!
Hollywood Tans: Senior Tanologist: Red Light Therapy to the Rescue!: "You may have been seeing a lot of posts about Red Light Therapy coming to some of our Hollywood Tans salons, so we're here to give you all t..."
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
IRS to spend $11.5 million on agents in order to collect the tan tax (US News)
Healthcare Reform Law Requires New IRS Army Of 1,054 (including 81 agents just to collect the tan tax) - Washington Whispers (usnews.com)
Tired of paying the tan tax? Worried about the government spending hundreds of millions in order to collect the 10% tax on UV tanning? Visit www.repealtantax.com today and let your members of Congress know you don't support this punitive and unfair tax.
Tired of paying the tan tax? Worried about the government spending hundreds of millions in order to collect the 10% tax on UV tanning? Visit www.repealtantax.com today and let your members of Congress know you don't support this punitive and unfair tax.
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Hollywood Tans: Senior Tanologist: Tanning Rules To Live By!
Hollywood Tans: Senior Tanologist: Tanning Rules To Live By!: "For all tanners, new and experienced alike, here are the three main rules to always follow when tanning! 1. Say no to dry tanning! Wh..."
Friday, February 11, 2011
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Study: Effects of Red Light on Development
"Furthermore, our data suggest that developmental 670-nm light exposure may exert beneficial effects on growth and development, including improved survival."
http://www.warplighttherapy.com/PDFs/670nm.pdf
http://www.warplighttherapy.com/PDFs/670nm.pdf
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Monday, February 7, 2011
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Mystic tan my review (unbiased)
She did a Mystic Tan, but not at Hollywood Tans of Atlanta. Gives you a good idea of how happy customers are with the color from a Mystic Tan. More info about Hollywood Tans' Mystic Tan at www.SprayTanNow.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)