Monday, December 20, 2010

World Health Organization: The known health effects of UV

http://www.who.int/uv/faq/uvhealtfac/en/index1.html

Are there beneficial effects of UV radiation?



The sun's rays provide warmth and light that enhance your general feeling of well-being and stimulate blood circulation. Some UV radiation is essential to the body as it stimulates the production of vitamin D. Vitamin D has an important function in increasing calcium and phosphorus absorption from food and plays a crucial role in skeletal development, immune function and blood cell formation. There is no doubt that a little sunlight is good for you! But 5 to 15 minutes of casual sun exposure of hands, face and arms two to three times a week during the summer months is sufficient to keep your vitamin D levels high. Closer to the equator, where UV levels are higher, even shorter periods of exposure suffice.




Hence, for most people, vitamin D deficiency is unlikely. Possible exceptions are those who have very limited sun exposure such as the housebound elderly, or those with heavily pigmented skin who live in high-latitude countries where UV levels are relatively low. Recognising the need for vitamin D, many countries have introduced supplements into common food like flour, cereals and milk. Naturally occurring vitamin D is very rare in our diet, it is present mainly in fatty fish and cod liver oil.



UV radiation has been used to successfully treat a number of diseases, including rickets, psoriasis, eczema and jaundice. This therapeutic use cannot eliminate the negative side-effects of UV radiation but treatment takes place under medical supervision to ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks.



Rickets

Rickets causes a child's bones to soften because they are not getting enough calcium. One common reason for this is a lack of vitamin D. Vitamin D increases calcium absorption from food and transports the ion from the gut into the bone. UV radiation exposure stimulates the production of vitamin D. However, today, most people receive enough vitamin D from supplements in the food they eat.



Lupus vulgaris

Lupus vulgaris is tuberculosis of the skin. It used to be common especially in northern Europe during the winter. The disease produces large ulcers on the face and neck, which are difficult to cure and often leave bad scars. A Danish doctor called Neils Finzen developed a UVB lamp that was so successful in curing the disease that it won him the Nobel prize in 1903. Today, Lupus is very rare and is usually treated successfully with antibiotics.



Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a disease which produces sores and scaling of the skin. It affects 2 to 3 per cent of the population and is probably an autoimmune disease; a disease where your immune system attacks your own cells. Among the treatments for psoriasis PUVA therapy is one of the most popular and successful. The patient is given a drug called psoralen to make the skin more sensitive to UV and is subsequently exposed to UVA radiation. This is repeated several times in the course of treatment. Unfortunately, PUVA treatment increases the patient's risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma, the most common type of skin cancer.



Vitiligo

Vitiligo is a patchy loss of skin pigmentation caused by destruction of the pigment-producing cells called melanocytes. It is probably an autoimmune disease and can be treated by PUVA therapy. In PUVA treatment, the patient is given a drug called psoralen to make the skin more sensitive to UV and is subsequently exposed to UVA radiation. The therapy is fairly successful but increases the patient's risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma, the most common type of skin cancer.

Sun is good for you in moderation

http://www.webmd.boots.com/osteoporosis/news/20101216/sun-is-good-for-you-in-moderation

"Avoiding sunburn still remains the most important thing people can do to protect themselves against developing skin cancer... By enjoying the sun safely, people can make enough vitamin D without increasing their risk of skin cancer," Ed Yong, head of health information and evidence at Cancer Research UK.

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Beat the Blues This Winter | Importance of getting sun

By Dr. Al Sears, MD

http://www.alsearsmd.com/beat-the-blues-this-winter/

Hollywood Tans: Senior Tanologist: Need to lose 5lbs instantly? Not a problem.

Hollywood Tans: Senior Tanologist: Need to lose 5lbs instantly? Not a problem.: "If you're in desperate need of an immediate shape up, look no further than your nearest Hollywood Tans salon. A tan is the easiest wa..."

Hollywood Tans: Senior Tanologist: Tanning Beds vs. the Sun

Hollywood Tans: Senior Tanologist: Tanning Beds vs. the Sun: "Research is continuing to support the idea that tanning beds are actually less harmful than the sun when used properly. Check out this..."

Britons now officially recommended to go out into the midday sun withOUT SPF to top up vitamin D levels


You CAN enjoy the sunshine at midday without suncream - but no more than 15 minutes a day, experts say
 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1339174/Britons-SHOULD-midday-sun-Vitamin-D.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Vitamin D Recommendations May Increase for Children : Internal Medicine News

The report “Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D” will be released to the public on Nov. 30, 2010, at 10 a.m. EST. The Chairman of Pediatrics at Memphis’ University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Dr. Russell Chesney, predicts this will coincide with an increase in the Institute of Medicine’s daily vitamin D recommendations for kids.


At the annual American Academy of Pediatrics meeting, the professor acknowledged the vast number of vitamin D-related health benefits, chiding: “Vitamin D truly is the center of the universe."

Although he admits the need for more studies on the vitamin’s superpower status, Chesney is supportive of ongoing health claims, noting the role of UV light in synthesizing the hormone. He also echoed the sentiment of the meeting’s keynote speaker – that today’s children are practically on “house arrest,” which could be fostering epidemic proportions of vitamin D deficiency worldwide.

Currently, the Institute of Medicine recommends 200 IU/day of vitamin D for anyone 50 or younger. Chesney reports that several organizations contacted the group with concerns that this amount was too low.



Source: Vitamin D Recommendations May Increase for Children : Internal Medicine News

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Rep. Graves: Opposed to the Tan Tax

http://tomgraves.house.gov/news/press-releases/2010/07/graves-taxed-today-tan-no-more.shtml


“There are many small businesses in the 9th District of Georgia, and among these small businesses are tanning beds, much of which are owned by women. This 10 percent tax increase is simply another kick to the gut of small businesses and will only hurt job creation in the United States,” said Congressman Graves.

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Hollywood Tans once again voted Best Tanning Salon by InSite Atlanta voters

For the second year in a row, InSite Magazine has voted Hollywood Tans multiple area locations as the Best Tanning Salons in Atlanta (http://insiteatlanta.com/bestofatlanta2010.asp).

According to InSite Atlanta, "As the largest chain of professional tanning salons, memberships at Hollywood Tans can be used at any of their 250+ locations nationwide. No appointments are necessary, and with an average of 15 booths at each location, you can be in and out on your schedule. Their vertical tanning system gives customers the most comfortable, sanitary way to achieve their perfect shade."

InSite is one of the longest running alternative papers in Atlanta, serving Atlanta's young professional market with entertainment coverage.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Member of Congress John Lewis ignores our questions about the tan tax

We have reached out to Representative John Lewis (GA 5th district) numerous times about the 10% Tan Tax. And each time they've sent a boiler plate response that makes no mention about the Tan Tax. All we're looking for is Rep. Lewis' response as to why he supported the Tan Tax in the Health Care bill, and his thoughts on repealing this unfair and burdening tax on our consumers. Mr. Lewis' latest response (below) is the worst of all... a canned response regarding our e-mail which supposedly expressed our "support for increasing federal funding for health research and disease prevention programs" (certainly an important topic but one we mentioned ZERO times in our e-mail to him). His actions show a complete lack of respect for the concerns of his constituents. We urge Hollywood Tans customers in the 5th district to reach out to Rep. Lewis yourself to ask why he is ignoring our concerns about the Tan Tax.


-----------------------------------
Sent: Wed 9/29/2010 5:07 PM
To: owner@hollywoodtansatlanta.com
From: Congressman John Lewis [imaga05.pub@mail.house.gov]


Thank you for contacting me to express your support for increasing federal funding for health research and disease prevention programs. My heart goes out to all who suffer from chronic illnesses and debilitating medical conditions. I firmly believe the government has a moral obligation to stand by our courageous brothers and sisters by caring for them and promoting medical advancements that will fight and cure disease.

I have always been a strong and vocal supporter of full funding for the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which I'm proud to say is headquartered in Georgia's fifth district. Research done by these institutions is vital to the health of all Americans. A firm commitment to the NIH and CDC is a commitment to treating, curing, and preventing the most debilitating medical conditions of our time.

Stem Cell research is another area in which I believe we can make great progress in combating serious illnesses. As you know, a vast majority of experts believe that embryonic stem cells are the best hope of curing a host of complex diseases. I am a strong supporter of ethical stem cell research and the role that it can play in the advancement of health and medical research. We must provide doctors and patients with the most advanced research to fight these terrible diseases.

I will continue to fight for better treatment and care for patients with serious medical ailments. A strong government commitment to the best medical research represents our best hope for curing - among other things - cancer, diabetes, and AIDS. Thank you again for contacting me about this incredibly important issue. I hope that you will continue to share your views with me. Also, please visit my web site at http://www.house.gov/johnlewis/ for information on other issues of interest to you.

Sincerely,

John Lewis
Member of Congress

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

New Survey Confirms the 'Look Good, Feel Good' Effect from Indoor Tanning

A new survey supports the view that people enjoy the look, control and self-esteem that is derived from tanning indoors. These results depict a much different attitude than what is being reported in beauty magazines and other media.

The survey tested the knowledge of indoor tanners on topics such as indoor tanning rays vs natural sunlight, as well as opinions on whether indoor tanning is addictive.

An overwhelming 97 percent responding said they felt relaxed and energized when tanning indoors. 71 percent surveyed stated that fashion models look much better with a tan.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Hollywood Tans: Senior Tanologist: The Naked Truth

Hollywood Tans: Senior Tanologist: The Naked Truth: "To tan naked or not to tan naked; that is the question! I know that when it comes to the big naked debate, everyone is pretty equally divid..."

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Pale skin considered less attractive than cellulite and bulging bellies

London airport offers free spray tan

Relaxnews
Thursday, 29 July 2010

Seems as if the days of the English Rose are in the past: the British capital's Gatwick airport is offering travelers a free spray tan through August 1.


Called Gatwick Glow, the tanning lounge was launched this week after research by the airport revealed that travelers were uncomfortable with baring their pale skin at their holiday destination.

Surprisingly, more men than women expressed this concern in Gatwick's poll, while more than 30 percent of all survey participants said they were dreading the first day on the beach because they weren't tanned. Yet more unexpectedly, pale skin was considered even less attractive than cellulite and bulging bellies.

Kim Francis, the airport's marketing manager, said she hoped the lounge would make passengers "feel great about themselves" and "prevent them from overdoing [the tanning] on the beach."

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

What Do You Lack? Probably Vitamin D

By JANE E. BRODY


Published: July 26, 2010
 
Vitamin D promises to be the most talked-about and written-about supplement of the decade. While studies continue to refine optimal blood levels and recommended dietary amounts, the fact remains that a huge part of the population — from robust newborns to the frail elderly, and many others in between — are deficient in this essential nutrient. ... (more)

Monday, July 26, 2010

Nutra Legacy: Indoor tanning preferable to tanning in the sun

5 Ways to Get Best Skin Tan and Avoid Damaging UV rays: Offering tips on the best way to tan

If you have pale skin, then you may want to get a little color. However, getting a tan can be a pretty risky endeavor these days. There was a time when you did your skin tanning out under the sun, but thanks to the high UV index, that is no longer possible. In fact, too much exposure to the sun and its damaging radiation is one of the leading skin cancer causes out there. However, there are plenty of ways to get the best skin tan and avoid damaging UV rays all at once.




1. Right Time Under Sun



Now, tanners typically fall into two categories: those who would not even consider baking under the sun and risking the wrath of one of the biggest skin cancer causes, and those who think nothing of spending hours beneath the sun’s rays. Why not look for a happy medium instead? It is still possible to safely get a tan under the sun. You can simply limit the amount of time you spend beneath it. Do not expose yourself for more than an hour at a time. When the sun is particularly intense, you should limit it to thirty minutes. Furthermore, always wear sun screen. It can help reduce the effect the high UV index can have on your skin.



2. Tanning Beds



To be perfectly honest, as most of us are becoming aware, using a tanning bed is not the best skin tan option out there – but it is preferable to the sun! You have more rigid control over the amount of UV rays you receive, the amount of time you spend tanning, and the conditions in which you are doing so.



3. Extending Your Tan



If you do decide to do your skin tanning under the sun or in a tanning bed, you can be safe by trying to make your tan last as long as possible. You can do this simply be keeping your skin moisturized, so it doesn’t peel. That way, the outer layer of skin holding the melanin that gives you a tanned color, moisturizing will help it stay intact longer.



4. Rub-On Tans



The safest way to get the best skin tan is by using a self tanner. Rub on tanning products are a favorite in this genre. Of course, the only problem is that they can sometimes be a little too intense. In other words, you could end up looking like a pumpkin or a carrot. To avoid that orange patina, you need to be very careful both in your choice of product and in your application of it.



5. Spray-On Tans



A lot of people find that spray on tanners are a much better breed of self tanning. Here you have the option of making sure your tan is even, and as light or as dark as you want it while avoiding all of those other skin cancer causes.



The information supplied in this article is not to be considered as medical advice and is for educational purposes only.

Bright colors when tanned

July 4, 2010
By Valentina dePertis



When you have got a summer glow it is night to show it off by wearing bright colors. Earnings: Aldo Sweater: Gina tricot Top: Urban outfitters

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Helath Care, Vitamin D, and Indoor Tanning

A great summary of the benefits of indoor tanning / UV exposure coupled with links to research that popular media (and dermatologists) seems to be largely ignoring: Just 'D' Facts

"It is a shame that this Congress is doing everything backwards. Moderate and controlled non-burning exposure to Sunshine would reduce Health Care costs, not add to it."

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Chemical Sunscreen the New Tobacco?

Posted July 14, 2010 at http://twitter.com/ClassicTan

Doctors and the AMA were paid huge dollars to sponsor big tobacco in the 1950s. In Serpent on the Staff, Chicago Times reporters Howard Wolinsky and Tom Brune expose such unhealthy practices of the AMA and their 300,000 doctor members. Would you believe doctors continued to represent big tobacco six years after the first U.S. Surgeon General’s warnings appeared on cigarettes?

Today, you are lead to believe chemical sunscreens are safe because they are sold in stores and recommended, again, for profit, by doctors and trusted organizations like the American Academy of Dermatology. However, a recent U.S. CDC study finds 97% of Americans are contaminated with Oxybenzone – the chemical found in 588 sunscreens, 172 facial moisturizers, 111 lip balms, and 81 different types of lipstick. Many of those products buy “seals of approval” from trusted organizations like the American Academy of Dermatology, the Skin Cancer Foundation and the American Cancer Society.

Oxybenzone and other sunscreen chemicals behave like estrogens, disrupting normal hormonal function. In lakes, where chemical-laden swimmers frequent, fish are jumping gender from male to female. Oxybenzone is also responsible for killing coral. Chemical sunscreens, contrary to popular belief, do not reflect sunlight harmlessly away. When sunlight strikes the chemical a reaction occurs converting energy into free radicals responsible for premature aging and DNA damage – which can lead to skin cancer.

Today as in the 1950s, doctors are concerned more about profit than your health. Chemical sunscreen is the new tobacco.

Study: Melanoma is NOT increasing in actual incidence, but merely in reported incidence

Dermatology conspiracy? A 2009 British Journal of Dermatology report concluded that melanoma isn't increasing in actual incidence, but merely in reported incidence. The report found that doctors were simply reporting and removing more lesions that may not actually be cancerous.

Is Profit Behind Dermatology's 'Sun Scare' Message?

Next time your dermatologist scares you with facts about the dangers of UV exposure, melanoma, or the importance of using SPF lotions, you may want to read this article first: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/harmon-leon/is-profit-behind-dermatol_b_640929.html

One of the most interesting facts: According to the National Cancer Institute, melanoma only contributes just 0.1 percent of all cancer deaths--it isn't even in the top 15 when it comes to cancer.

This past spring the Association of Health Care Journalists called into question dermatology's math about melanoma. AHCJ reported a person's risk of melanoma is identified at roughly two-to-three per thousand. (Whether they catch sun outdoors or in a tanning bed.) Melanoma is quite rare and it's actually declining in most of the population, except for older men, who get it most often. Oddly, the media marketing campaign for skin cancer prevention is aimed almost entirely at young women, who have less than a one in 100,000 chance of succumbing to melanoma. According to the National Cancer Institute's data, that number has actually gone down more than 50 percent in women 20 to 49 since 1975.

Michael Hicks: Tan tax is downright silly... a modest proposal

"The problem is that this tax fails every single criterion of effective tax policy. It is narrow, easily avoided, suffers high administrative costs, and distorts consumer and producer behavior. It is downright silly..." By Michael Hicks • For The Star Press • July 11, 2010, "MICHAEL HICKS: A modest proposal: The SUN Tax of 2010"

Monday, July 12, 2010

Vitamin D Fears Lead to Sun Warnings Review - Beauty & Skin - FOXNews.com

Vitamin D Fears Lead to Sun Warnings Review - Beauty & Skin - FOXNews.com

Nebraska tanning-industry group plans tax protest

From the Associated Press: The Associated Press June 25, 2010, 1:44PM ET

LINCOLN, Neb.

The Nebraska Indoor Tanning Association is planning to protest at the Capitol in Lincoln next week against a new federal tax on tanning beds.

The 10 percent tax on tanning bed use starts nationwide on Thursday, part of the federal health care overhaul.

A news release from association says the so-called "tan tax" is part of an ongoing scare campaign, "orchestrated by dermatologists and cosmetic companies, that exploits inaccurate fears of the sun" and ultraviolet light.

The association says the tax is unfair because fitness clubs that offer indoor tanning are exempt from the tax.

The rally is set to begin at 10 a.m. Thursday at the Capitol.

Source: http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9GIEM501.htm

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Hollywood Tans CEO: Tax Is Arrogant

Hollywood Tans CEO: Tax Is Arrogant

Hollywood Tans CEO comments on the Tan Tax, making an excellent point that classifying this as a Sin Tax is unfair... studies don't show any significant connection between cancer and indoor tanning... they show a connection between BURNING and cancer. Responsible tanning... that's the Hollywood Tans mantra!


Hollywood Tans owner interviewed about nation's new Tan Tax

The federal government's new tan tax went into effect on July 1st, and 11Alive news interviewed the owner of Hollywood Tans of Atlanta regarding the impact it'll have on the industry. Check it out yourself at: New Tanning Law Reaction!

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Hollywood Tans to offer FREE TANS to EVERYBODY on July 3rd as part of TanNation Independence Day

Hollywood Tans is offering one free HT60 tan (a $20 value!) for every customer at the 4 HollywoodTansAtlanta.com salons this Saturday, July 3rd, 2010 as part of TanNation Independence Day 2010! Open until 10pm! Upgrade your free tan to a UV-Free spray tan (a Glow cartridge in our Instant Tan powered by Mystic) for only $10! Discounts and other special offers! Call 866-970-TANS or visit www.HollywoodTansAtlanta.com for more information on Hollywood Tans of Atlanta!

Be sure to RSVP on our Facebook event page to receive a valuable coupon prior to the big event!

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

ABC News - Vitamin D from UV Exposure can decrease cancer by up to 80%



"People who use tanning beds have much much stronger bones and higher Vitamin D levels." - Health Expert Dr. Marc Sorenson

Did Melanoma Researchers 'Reverse Engineer' Their Findings?


May 25, 2010 15:33 ET







Did Melanoma Researchers 'Reverse Engineer' Their Findings?


Anti-Tanning Lobbying Group Downplayed Key Conflicting Information, According to Smart Tan











JACKSON, MI--(Marketwire - May 25, 2010) - A University of Minnesota advocacy group may have "reverse-engineered" a study to bolster its own pre-existing anti-indoor tanning crusade, failing to properly cite the significance of conflicting data within its own paper, downplaying confounding data that opposed its conclusions and failing to disclose the conflict-of-interest of its own anti-tanning advocacy efforts.

"This study was designed and executed by an advocate, not a neutral party, and the advocate failed to properly disclose that she is not a neutral party," said Joseph Levy, vice president of International Smart Tan Network, the educational institute for the North American indoor tanning community. "That conflict of interest clouds some of the irregularities reported in the paper."

Dr. DeAnn Lazovich, lead author of "Indoor Tanning and Risk of Melanoma: A Case-Control Study in a Highly Exposed Population," set for publication in the June issue of American Association for Cancer Research, failed to disclose in the paper that she is part of a University of Minnesota group that initiated programs to discourage indoor tanning use three years before designing and engaging in data collection for this study. Those interactions may themselves have tainted subjects and controls used in the study.

Most epidemiologic papers on this topic (18 of 23 ever conducted) show no statistically significant association between indoor tanning usage and melanoma. The ones that have shown an association have failed to accurately account for confounding variables such as genetic predisposition, home tanning unit usage or outdoor sun exposure habits.

The International Smart Tan Network finds serious flaws with the study, including:


  • Failure to disclose conflict of interest and deceptive research practices
  • Failure to disclose conflicting findings and confounding factors
  • Failure to highlight study and control group bias by choosing study participants who are naturally predisposed to melanoma
  • Failure to cite absolute risk factors, as opposed to relative risk
  • Failure to cite other sources, such as sunscreen use, for risks associated with melanoma
  • Failure to explain a 5-fold higher usage of indoor tanning in the study's control group when compared to the national average

Specifically:

(1) The authors downplayed conflicting evidence. The study showed that individuals who got the most outdoor sun exposure in their lives had a 15 percent lower risk of melanoma when compared to those who got less sun -- a conflicting result from their main thesis. The paper is actually the latest in a line of studies showing that people who get the most UV exposure outdoors actually are less likely to contract the disease.

"Despite what the authors in this paper set out to prove, the fact remains that whatever relationship UV exposure has with melanoma is still not understood because paper after paper, including this one, continue to show that people who get more sun exposure have fewer melanomas," said Dr. William Grant, founder of the independent (SUNARC). Grant, an independent advocate for UV exposure as the natural and intended source of vitamin D, published a peer-reviewed meta-analysis this year showing that indoor tanning is not a risk factor for melanoma in individuals with skin that can tan, with UV-related risk isolated only in the fairest-skinned "Skin Type I" subjects who have tanned in the past in Europe, but who are screened in North American tanning facilities. Dr. Grant's study is available at: http://sunarc.org/press31504.htm

That appears to be why the University of Minnesota group chose the ethnically homogenous Minnesota, whose population is 80 percent fair-skinned Northern European heritage and not representative of the U.S. population.

(2) In suggesting that tanners double their risk of melanoma, the authors mention only relative risk figures in the paper, ignoring that more telling figure that the absolute risk of melanoma is quite low for both tanners and non-tanners. The largest study to date shows that both indoor tanners and non-tanners have less than a 0.3 percent risk of contracting melanoma and most studies show no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

The misleading nature of "relative risk" figures in melanoma data was the topic of an article published by the Association of Health Care Journalists on May 7 by Dr. Ivan Oransky, a Reuters Health editor: http://bit.ly/dteTaz

Oransky quotes Dr. Lisa Schwartz, a general internist at Veterans Affairs Medical Center in White River Junction, Vt., and co-author of "Know Your Chances," a book that explains health statistics to consumers.

"Melanoma is pretty rare and almost all the time, the way to make it look scarier is to present the relative change, the 75 percent increase, rather than to point out that it is still really rare," Schwartz told The News Journal's Hiran Ratnayake, who interviewed Schwartz in a March 4, 2010 article on melanoma and indoor tanning.

(3) The Minnesota study also reported that high lifetime chemical sunscreen usage increased melanoma risk by 31 percent -- a finding the authors downplay but which comes on the heels of an Environmental Working Group report this week showing that sunscreen usage may be contributing to cancer risk: http://bit.ly/b1LsG4

(4) There are statistical irregularities in the Minnesota paper. While only an estimated 10 percent of the adult population in Minnesota utilizes indoor tanning facilities, 51 percent of the paper's "randomly selected" control group had used tanning equipment -- a statistical difference so unlikely as to almost be impossible.

(5) The authors admit that researchers and doctors had undocumented inappropriate interactions with the case group. And while they attempt to explain this, they don't disclose that the study's University of Minnesota designers had engaged in a multi-year campaign to discourage indoor tanning usage for years prior to conducting this study -- a conflict-of-interest that likely created bias in doctors, cases and all doctor-case interactions in the study.

Because the results of this study are statistical outliers in the sum of work on this topic, the potential for bias in this study model cannot be discounted, particularly because the authors failed to disclose their anti-tanning advocacy conflict-of-interest.

(6) The University of Minnesota group engaged in deceptive practices in 2001 when, using a National Cancer Institute grant, it developed a bogus indoor tanning training program in order to obtain data from indoor tanning facilities for future studies. According to reports, the Minnesota group told salons they were attempting to help operators lower their risks, but the University of Minnesota refers to the same grant on its web site as an effort to reduce indoor tanning usage.

http://www.cancer.umn.edu/research/profiles/lazovich.html

(7) The authors understate the nature of previous research on this topic, suggesting that, "With at least 29 reports to date, past history of indoor tanning has been only weakly associated with melanoma." In fact, 18 of 22 previous studies show no statistically significant association.

(8) The authors misstate the nature of a 2009 IARC report on indoor tanning and melanoma -- a 400-word article in which IARC classified UV light from indoor tanning units as carcinogenic. In fact, the U.S. government has classified UV light from indoor tanning as carcinogenic since the publication of The 9th Report on Carcinogens 2000. But, more accurately, such a classification has no dose attached to it. According to that report, "The Report does not present quantitative assessments of carcinogenic risk. Listing of substances in the Report, therefore, does not establish that such substances present carcinogenic risks to individuals in their daily lives."

"Saying that UV is dangerous and should be avoided without mentioning that critical caveat is like saying that water is dangerous because it causes drowning, and therefore humans should avoid all water," Levy said. "It's a misrepresentation."

Smart Tan believes a balanced picture about UV exposure -- which vitamin D research in the past two years has proven is natural and intended -- will benefit consumers.

"We are happy to participate in that discussion on a high level. While the professional indoor tanning community continues to responsibly warn people about the risks of sunburn and overexposure, groups who benefit financially from overstating the risks of regular non-burning UV exposure continue to misrepresent data to the detriment of the consumer," Levy continued, "We think the promotion of this study has more to do with justifying a dinosaur mentality about UV light in an era when vitamin D research is proving that decades of overzealous sun avoidance may have skyrocketed SPF sales, but has caused epidemic-level vitamin D deficiency and great confusion in the population."







Media Contact:
Chris Capra
Lotus Public Relations
Email Contact
212-922-5885






Click here to see all recent news from this company



Friday, May 21, 2010

Canadian Doctor says: Moderate exposure to UVB light through indoor tanning can solve vitamin D deficiency

TORONTO, ONTARIO, MEDIA RELEASE--(Marketwire - May 13, 2010) - It's time to take a common sense approach to UVB light exposure primarily because moderate UVB light exposure year round will help solve Canada's vitamin D deficiency epidemic, says Dr. Zoltan Rona, a Toronto doctor specializing in complementary and alternative medicine.

"All cells, tissues and organs in the body have vitamin D receptors, meaning they await the arrival of the vitamin to perform various vital functions," said Dr. Rona. A recent Statistics Canada survey found 65 per cent of Canadians are vitamin D deficient. "I believe the actual number is much higher. In my own practice, over 90 per cent of my new patients are vitamin D deficient."

A study published last month in the peer reviewed Molecular Nutrition & Food research journal, An Estimate of the Economic Burden and Premature Deaths Due to Vitamin D Deficiency in Canada showed vitamin D deficiency is contributing to 37,000 deaths per year in Canada.

In his new book, Vitamin D, The Sunshine Vitamin, Dr. Rona recommends Canadians consider using a sunbed that emits UVB light during the winter months to maintain healthy vitamin D blood levels.

He says Canada must overcome its case of sunphobia - a condition imposed on the population by sun paranoid dermatologists who are paid to promote sunscreens and telling Canadians to spend too much time indoors due to the fear of aging from sun damage, as contributing factors to vitamin D deficiency. "The truth is that the benefits of ultraviolet light have been underestimated while its dangers have been grossly exaggerated", said Dr. Rona "It's not too late to return to some balance as it relates to our relationship with the sun."

Because of the country's northern latitudes, Canadians can't produce vitamin D naturally from the sun for four to six months of the year.

"We need to re-examine our current condemnation of all UV exposure. The health implications of vitamin D deficiency caused by anti sun messaging have put our health at risk. This needs to change. Due to its relationship with UVB light and its ability to produce vitamin D the skin could turn out to be the body's most important organ as it relates to disease prevention," Dr. Rona said.

Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to a number of diseases such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

"Human beings evolved under ultraviolet light. This is the way our bodies were biologically designed to produce vitamin D and it is a mistake to ignore this. In Canada we are unable to produce adequate vitamin D from sunlight six months of the year," Dr. Rona said. "For this reason, all sources of vitamin D need to be utilized. If you can't bask in the summer sun, then jump into a tanning bed or take a supplement to get your vitamin D levels up," he added.


IN: HEALTH, OTHER

For more information, please contact

Peter Turkington
Primary Phone: 905-901-9218
E-mail: pturkington@stratcommsolutions.ca

Article appears at http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/-1259681.htm

Win a free High Pressure tan!



Post your favorite tip for getting a great summer tan on the wall of our Facebook page by May 31, 2010! The most unique idea will receive a FREE HIGH PRESSURE TAN, a $25 value!

Ten Tanning Tips to Get that Flawless Summer Tan


1. Start Fresh – Exfoliate your skin to remove oils and fragrances and to expose the top layer of skin. Shave before rather than after tanning to remove dead skin cells so you tan evenly.

2. Choose Stand Up Tanning – Not all indoor tanning equipment is created equal. Vertical tanning booths are more hygienic than traditional lie-down beds, which can harbor germs from previous tanners, especially if beds are not cleaned frequently. In addition, stand up tanning booths have no “pressure points” so they give you a 360-degree flawless tan without tan lines.

3. Instant Gratification – It’s ok to want great color now. Boost your bronze quotient with a sunless spray tan by Mystic. Spray tanning by Mystic only takes about 90 seconds and will give you a rich, deep tan that will last for a week. Or try Hollywood Tans’ exclusive “Double Feature” to get both the instant tan and to build your base.


4. Build Your Base for Lasting Color – Before you head outside, consider several tanning sessions over three or four weeks to condition and help prepare your skin.

5. Pure Glam, All the Time, Naturally – Get a natural and sophisticated tan with lotions infused with organic extracts, essential moisturizers and antioxidants to pamper your skin and extend your tan.

6. Tan Fresh – For the freshest feeling, look for custom-designed fragrances and bronzer-free tan accelerators that combine shea butter, Vitamin E, and botanical extracts.

7. Take a Break Before Showering - If you use a bronzing lotion to enhance your tan, you may not realize that your lotion is working for up to four hours after application. So let your tan set in and your skin will take on a deeper, richer glow.

8. Maintain a Radiant Glow – Use a gentle body cleanser, like a fresh mint shower gel, that washes away impurities without drying, fading or leaving an unpleasant residue. Smooth the gel over your skin every day in the shower or bath instead of using ordinary soap or bath gel.

9. Extend Your Glow – For advanced skincare protection and healthier-looking skin, use a daily moisturizing tan extender. A tan extender revitalizes skin with antioxidant vitamins that provide age defying, anti-wrinkle properties and give your skin proper hydration, vitamins, and nutrients that preserve, protect and extend your tan.

10. Brighten and Whiten – Nothing makes a tan look like a million bucks than a bright white smile. There are lots of options from your local drug store, and your dentist, or get your Hollywood Whites from your tanning salon. It’s the finishing touch to make you look summer ready and simply stunning.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

New Vitamin D recommendations for older men and women

Article appears at http://www.iofbonehealth.org/newsroom/media-releases/detail.html?mediaReleaseID=132

Nyon, Switzerland
May 10, 2010

IOF has released a new position statement on Vitamin D for older adults which makes important recommendations for vitamin D nutrition from an evidence-based perspective.

The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) has released a new position statement on Vitamin D for older adults which makes important recommendations for vitamin D nutrition from an evidence-based perspective.

Vitamin D is important for bone and muscle development, function and preservation. For this reason it is a vital component in the maintenance of bone strength and in the prevention of falls and osteoporotic fractures.

The objective of this statement, published in the leading bone journal, Osteoporosis International (OI DOI 10 1007/s00198-010-1285-3), was to use and examine all available evidence to support new recommendations for optimal vitamin D status.

The best available clinical indicator of vitamin D status is serum 25OHD and vitamin D intake and effective sun exposure are the major determinants of this level. Serum 25OHD levels decline with ageing but the response to vitamin D3 supplementation is not affected by age or by usual calcium dietary intake.

Preventing vitamin D deficiency has a major impact on falls and osteoporotic fractures. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with decreased muscle strength in older men and women and supplementation improves lower limb strength and reduces risk of falling. Vitamin D affects fracture risk through its effect on bone metabolism and on falls risk.

Key recommendations:

•The estimated average vitamin D requirement of older adults to reach a serum 25OHD level of 75 nmol/l (30ng/ml) is 20 to 25 µg/day (800 to 1000 IU/day).
•Intakes may need to increase to as much as 50 µg(2000IU) per day in individuals who are obese, have osteoporosis, limited sun exposure (e.g. housebound or institutionalised), or have malabsorption.
•For high risk individuals it is recommended to measure serum 25OHD levels and treat if deficient.
The lead author of the statement, Professor Bess Dawson-Hughes of Tufts University, US, stated that, “Global vitamin D status shows widespread insufficiency and deficiency. This high prevalence of suboptimal levels raises the possibility that many falls and fractures can be prevented with vitamin D supplementation. This is a relatively easy public health measure that could have significant positive effects on the incidence of osteoporotic fractures.”
ENDS

ABOUT IOF
The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) is a nongovernmental umbrella organization dedicated to the worldwide fight against osteoporosis, the disease known as “the silent epidemic”. IOF’s members – committees of scientific researchers, patient, medical and research societies and industry representatives from around the world – share a common vision of a world without osteoporotic fractures. Launched in 1998 with the merger of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (EFFO, founded in 1987) and the International Federation of Societies on Skeletal Diseases, IOF now represents 195 societies in 92 locations. http://www.iofbonehealth.org


Related Article: Vitamin D: What We Know, What We Don’t, What We Need To Know
http://www.lookingfit.com/articles/science/vitamin-d-what-we-know-what-we-dont.html

Thursday, May 13, 2010

No causal link between sunbed-use and cancer

This article appears at http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/8659/

Wednesday 28 April 2010

Basham and Luik

Let’s put cancerous myths to bed
There’s no causal link between sunbed-use and cancer, so why are politicians clamping down on teens tannning?

Ever since the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded, last summer, that ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure from sunbeds is ‘carcinogenic to humans’, the British medical and health promotion establishment, along with the government, has been ramping up efforts to ban the use of sunbeds. Now, Gillian Merron, Britain’s public health minister, has said that the government intends to ban under-18s from using tanning salons after a study in the British Medical Journal reported that at least 250,000 children aged 11 to 17 use sunbeds.

The basis for the IARC decision and the government’s intervention is twofold: first, that there is a melanoma epidemic in the UK, and, second, that there is a causal connection between sunbed-use and melanoma. Both of these claims are scientifically suspect.

In a recent study about the reported incidence of melanoma in the UK, a group of scientists at the dermatology department of Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital found that the increase in melanoma in East Anglia between 1991 and 2004 was ‘almost entirely due to minimal, stage 1 disease. There was no change in the combined incidence of the other stages of the disease, and the overall mortality only increased from 2.16 to 2.54 cases per 100,000 per year.’ According to the report authors, the claims of a melanoma epidemic are based not on a real increase in cases but rather on a ‘diagnostic drift which classifies benign lesions as stage 1 melanoma’. In the past these cases would have been diagnosed as benign melanocytic nevi, not melanoma.

Further weakening the claim that these early stage melanomas were the result of excessive sun exposure is the fact that most of the cases were in areas of the body not exposed to the sun. One of the report authors, Dr Nick J Levell, told Reuters, ‘The main message is to be cautious about overstating messages about a melanoma epidemic to the public and media. Such behaviour will tend to induce unnecessary anxiety and behaviour that may cause distress and harm.’

Yet the IARC claim about sunbeds and cancer risk does precisely what Levell warns against. In its press release announcing that it had concluded that radiation from sunbeds is carcinogenic, IARC implied that this finding was based on new scientific evidence. This was not the case. The basis for IARC’s conclusion is the agency’s 2006 report Exposure to Artificial UV Radiation and Skin Cancer. But this report provides no compelling evidence that sunbed-use is associated with an increased risk for skin cancer.



The report references 24 cohort and case-control studies on the association between use of indoor tanning facilities and melanoma risk. Of these only four show a small statistically significant relationship. None of the four have a relative risk greater than 1.50, indicating an extremely weak and unlikely relationship. Indeed, even the report authors admit that the evidence for a positive association between indoor tanning and melanoma is ‘weak’. It might be suggested that this statement is in itself misleading since the relationship is, in fact, practically nonexistent.

Despite the fact that there is virtually no scientific support in IARC’s report for the conclusion that ultraviolet radiation exposure from sunbeds is ‘carcinogenic to humans’, it is this very study that provides the sole basis for Gillian Merron’s move to ban adolescent use of tanning beds.

Finally, the largest prospective study of the risk of sunbeds for melanoma was by a team of researchers headed by Marit Veierød at the University of Oslo. They followed more than 100,000 Norwegian women over an average eight-year period and found no statistically significant association between sunbed-use and melanoma in those aged 10 to 19 who used a tanning facility more than once a month. Yet this is the target group for the UK government’s anti-sunbed campaign. Moreover, these findings correspond to a British study from 2004 which did not find a statistically significant association between use of sunbeds and melanoma.

So, not only is the public health minister failing, in the words of Levell, to be ‘cautious about overstating messages about a melanoma epidemic’ and tanning parlours - she has also proposed action that is clearly unsupported by the scientific evidence.

Patrick Basham directs the Democracy Institute and is a Cato Institute adjunct scholar. John Luik is a Democracy Institute senior fellow. They will be discussing the faux melanoma epidemic and other attacks on working-class culture on 29 April at the Institute of Economic Affairs. For more information about the event, click here.

New experiments show UVA does NOT cause melanoma

Melanoma not caused by early ultraviolet (UVA) light exposure, new fish experiments show

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

More reasons why tanning booths are better than laydown tanning beds: NYTimes article


One of the many benefits of stand-up booths are they are cleaner than typical lay-down beds. Hollywood Tans - Atlanta area salons feature all stand-up equipment, and for good reason! Why risk an infection? Try stand-up tanning instead!

(BTW, it's also faster than lay-down tanning!).

Check out this article from the NY Times from April 2010:

NY Times Article on Infections from Tanning Beds

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Miss Ohio Teen USA 2010 To Raise Awareness About Responsible Tanning, Moderate Exposure To UV Rays


From: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/backed-by-altima-tan-miss-ohio-teen-usa-2010-to-raise-awareness-about-responsible-tanning-moderate-exposure-to-uv-rays-92095249.html

AKRON, Ohio, April 26 /PRNewswire/ -- Bridget Linton is used to the spotlight.

Her passion for Irish dancing has landed her on stages throughout the U.S., Ireland and Scotland. A high school cheerleader and homecoming queen, today she's a freshman member of the dance team at the University of Akron while pursuing a major in broadcast journalism.

She's also Miss Ohio Teen USA 2010.

Crowned last October, Linton tours her state as a goodwill ambassador, making appearances at schools, guest speaking and working with charities including D.A.R.E., the Susan G. Komen Foundation and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.

One of her platforms during her year-long reign is responsible tanning and the health benefits gained from moderate exposure to UV rays.

"Moderate exposure to ultraviolet rays is the key to tanning responsibly," she said. "The danger of a body's exposure to UV rays comes when the skin gets burned and what can result from sunburn. Moderate exposure for people who can develop a tan is the smartest way to maximize the benefits of exposure and minimize risks."

Linton will advise people of all ages during her reign to learn their skin type, find out how much exposure their skin can accept without burning, protect their skin with protective lotions and wear safe, protective eyewear. "Those who find themselves in the sun regularly and people who utilize the services of a tanning salon should also check with their physicians about any photosensitivity issues they might have regarding prescription medication they're taking and exposure," she said.

She'll also help educate Ohioans about the benefits of UV exposure past simply getting a bronze glow on the outside.

"In the U.S., people are suffering from a serious vitamin D deficiency," said Tim Freeman who owns Altima Tan and Massage in Akron. Freeman approached Linton shortly after she was crowned to help back her responsible tanning platform. "Research has proven that UV rays trigger the synthesis of vitamin D and are responsible for the health benefits of exposure. While one doesn't have to develop a tan to produce vitamin D and everyone should avoid overexposure to prevent skin burn, which causes skin cancer, in reality tanning is a great way to stimulate the body's production of vitamin D."

Freeman's salon, in business since 2007, tans on average 260 people a day. He is an ardent supporter of tanning in moderation and tanning responsibly. He and each of his five employees strictly follow critically important tanning guidelines developed by tanning industry leader ETS Tan (http://www.etstan.com), the International Tanning Association, Suntan Supply and the FDA.

"Salon services are in higher demand by a wide range of individuals than ever before," he said. "As a business owner, I want to provide the best products and services at the best prices. But above all, I want to be a responsible, reputable business. Our top priority is to ensure that every customer who chooses to come in follows established tanning guidelines and most importantly follows recommended frequency and durations of sessions according to their skin type."

To learn more about Miss Ohio Teen USA 2010 Bridget Linton, visit http://www.missohiousa.com/teen.

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Check Out The Benefits Of Indoor Tanning Beds Today!

Check Out The Benefits Of Indoor Tanning Beds Today!: "Indoor tanning beds have become all the rage today. Teenagers flock in their droves to the tanning salons so they can get that all over tanned appearance. Although a lot of people..."

American Chronicle | The Advantages of Indoor Tanning

American Chronicle | The Advantages of Indoor Tanning

10 Reasons You Should Be Tested for Vitamin D

From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nalini-chilkov/10-reasons-you-should-be_b_525914.html

Life Saving and Health Promoting Benefits of Vitamin D:

Vitamin D can reduce your risk of the flu and complications of flu. Vitamin D contributes to lowering the incidence of infections and inflammation during the fall-winter flu season. The Canadian government has recommended increased Vitamin D intake as part of their flu prevention strategy, including prevention of H1N1 Swine Flu.

Vitamin D can reduce your risk of depression. Low levels of Vitamin D are associated with depression. Sun exposure is known to be a factor in relieving depression, especially winter depression also known as seasonal affective disorder.

Vitamin D can reduce chronic muscle aching and pain. Vitamin D helps to normalize blood calcium which is required for tight shortened muscles to soften, lengthen and relax out of spasm. When calcium is available to the muscles, menstrual cramps lessen.

Vitamin D can reduce your risk of cancer. Low levels of Vitamin D are associated with increased incidence of many cancers. Vitamin D normalizes cell to cell communication, impacts uncontrolled cell growth and allows cells to differentiate into normal cells with a normal life cycle.

Vitamin D can reduce your risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, heart attack and >atherosclerosis. Vitamin D has been shown to protect the lining of your blood vessels.

Vitamin D can reduce your risk of developing Type 1 Diabetes by 80%. Low levels of Vitamin D are found in diabetics.

Vitamin D can reduce your risk of getting autoimmune diseases like Multiple Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hashimoto's Thyroiditis, Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Lupus. Low levels of Vitamin D are associated with increased auto- immune attack, breakdown of your own tissues and loss of normal functions. Vitamin D supplementation has been shown to reduce the risk of multiple sclerosis by 40%.

Vitamin D can reduce your risk of bone fractures, bone loss and osteoporosis. Low levels of Vitamin D prevent your body from normal calcium metabolism and normal bone formation. Both men and women are at increased risk for bone loss and fractures as they age.


Did you think your body could make Vitamin D??

While the body can make Vitamin D when the skin is exposed to sunlight, modern life affords inadequate sun exposure to meet our Vitamin D needs.

Dark skinned people make less Vitamin D than those with light skin.

Aging skin makes 75% less Vitamin D than young skin.

Use of sunscreens blocks Vitamin D production in the skin.

Most people living modern life spend a larger proportion of their time indoors and with most of their skin surface covered by clothing or sunscreen when outdoors.

Ask your doctor to check your blood levels of 25-OH Vitamin D (Vitamin D3)

Blood levels of Vitamin D3 associated with OPTIMAL HEALTH are in the range of 70-120nmol/L, far above the "normal" ranges of the past decades before the recent surge of Vitamin D research changed our understanding of this essential vitamin.

Vitamin D rich foods include cold water fish such as wild salmon, wild cod and sardines and cod liver oil. However, it is difficult to regularly eat enough of these foods to build up your Vitamin D stores.

Get some sun exposure on your skin without sunscreen for 20-30 minutes in the morning or late afternoon. Do use sunscreen during the midday to protect your skin.

Be sure to take the correct biologically active form of Vitamin D which is Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), not Vitamin D2.


Be sure to get retested to monitor your Vitamin D levels. A thorough health care provider will also monitor your blood levels of calcium and phosphorus and parathyroid hormone and may also monitor your urine for evidence of bone loss or order a bone density test.


Please do so under the supervision of a knowledgeable health care provider who can assess the risks and benefits of Vitamin D supplementation and recommend the appropriate dose for you as an individual, taking into account your complete health history and any current medications.


For more on the confluence of natural healing and modern biomedicine and alternative cancer answers find me at doctornalini.com.

Dr Chilkov has been recognized as a go to clinician in Suzanne Somers' book "Knockout: Interviews with Doctors Who Are Curing Cancer--And How to Prevent Getting It in the First Place."

She also serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Mederi Foundation, which serves to promote a holistic, integrative approach to healing through education and clinical research programs with an emphasis on providing primary healthcare to those with cancer and chronic illnesses.

http://www.doctornalini.com

Friday, March 26, 2010

An open letter to President Obama and our Congressional Representatives

Dear President Obama,
Dear Representative Lewis,
Dear Senator Chambliss,
Dear Senator Isakson,

“The Tan Tax” proposal in the U.S. Senate health care bill is based on total misinformation. Regardless of your stance on health care reform, a tax on indoor tanning services will hurt more people than it helps, unfairly targets women and women-owned businesses, was proposed with no due-diligence whatsoever and makes no sense at all in this bill.

Specifically:

This tax unfairly targets lower- and middle-class female consumers with a 10 percent tax, as compared to the “Bo-tax” which would be a 5 percent tax on wealthy consumers.
This tax unfairly targets female business owners. An estimated 67 percent of tanning facilities are owned and operated by women.

The math does not add up – the proposal overestimates tanning revenues by 40-50 percent. It will not raise the revenues the government says it needed.
This will cost every community in America jobs and tax revenue. In a weak economy, this large, double-digit tax will hurt thousands of small, largely female-owned businesses, forcing many to close and/or lay off employees.

Dermatology lobbyists insisted that cosmetic phototherapy procedures in their offices – which use the same equipment as tanning businesses – be exempted from the tax. By targeting indoor tanning salons, they are attempting to drive 1.5 million phototherapy clients back into their businesses.

This was a back-room deal. This tax was added into the bill without studying its affect at all when those who sell Botox injections, phototherapy procedures and cosmetic surgery lobbied lawmakers to remove a much-better studied 5 percent tax on cosmetic surgery procedures from the bill — a tax that would have had less of an impact on society and would have raised more revenue to pay for this bill.

Sincerely,

Hollywood Tans of Atlanta

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

New Study Shows Tanning and Melanoma Link Scientifically Flawed

A new study published in the peer-reviewed journal "Dermato-Endocrinology" shows that there is no statistically significant connection between sunbeds and melanoma in those who can develop suntans (skin type II-VI), with increased risk centered only on those whose skin is so fair it cannot tan (skin type I).

William B. Grant, PhD, a former NASA atmospheric research scientist and founder of SUNARC, Sunlight, Nutrition and Health Research Center (SUNARC), re-examined the same epidemiological data used by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) group from their findings in 2007 titled, "The association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: a systematic review." Grant's study strongly challenges this review and argues it is both flawed and cannot be used as the basis for U.S. health policy.

The IARC review originally claimed a 15% increased risk of melanoma for ever use of sunbeds and a 75% increased risk in melanoma for respondents who had ever used or first used a tanning bed prior to age 35. Grant's findings show that with the removal of those with skin type I who possess the greatest genetic risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM), there fails to be any statistically significant link between ever use of indoor tanning facilities and CMM.

ACCORDING TO GRANT'S ANALYSIS:


-- The reported 75% increased risk of melanoma for those ever having
used a sunbed prior to age 35 drops to a 25% reduced risk of melanoma
in the United States based on a scientifically-centered reanalysis of
the data in the IARC report.

-- When skin type I is omitted from the IARC analysis, the reported 15%
increased risk in melanoma fails to remain statistically significant.
This is based on a meta-analysis of the 14 studies not from the UK,
where skin type I is most prevalent.

-- The IARC study inappropriately combined four studies from northern
Europe, one from the UK, one from Canada, and one from the U.S. in the
analysis of first use of sunbeds before the age of 35 years. There are
vast differences between American and European sunbed regulations and
use. US regulations do not allow Skin Type I patrons to tan, European
tanning beds are often used at home or are unsupervised and do not
follow the regulations in the U.S. The study fails to state that its
findings are not, and should not be considered "universal findings."

"The reason this 'Skin Type I' distinction is so important is that we now know that UV avoidance among people who can develop a tan has contributed to epidemic-level vitamin D deficiency in North America, with 3 out of 4 Americans being vitamin D deficient today," said Grant. "Our public health messages about the benefits of UV radiation from any source need to recognize this."

The IARC report was a meta-analysis of epidemiologic surveys -- questionnaire surveys designed to retrospectively identify correlations, but which do not by nature identify causation. As stated in the IARC report, "Epidemiologic studies to date give no consistent evidence that use of indoor tanning facilities in general is associated with the development of melanoma or skin cancer."

Melanoma's connection with UV exposure is controversial, as research clearly shows it is more common in indoor workers than in outdoor workers and is more common on parts of the body that aren't regularly exposed to sunlight, implicating sun burning rather than regular tanning.

THE IARC REVIEW ALSO NEGLECTED TO:


-- Find a dose-response relation between the amount of sunbed use and
risk of melanoma -- which would be key to establishing a causal
relationship.
-- Recognize a growing body of literature that shows that non-burning
UVB exposure reduces the risk of CMM, and that recreational exposure
and sun burning increases risk
-- Cite other potential reasons for increases in melanoma, including:
geography, differing sunbed regulations in various locations, gender,
increased travel to sunny places, greater levels of sunscreen use, or
the nature of solar UV exposure.

IMPORTANCE OF SUNLIGHT AND VITAMIN D TO OUR SURVIVAL

Another recent study from Grant, "In Defense of the Sun," published in Dermato-Endrocrinology, suggests that raising vitamin D blood levels to 45 ng/ml could reduce mortality rates in the United States by 15% and prevent up to 400,000 premature deaths from vitamin D deficiency-related diseases annually. Such diseases include many types of cancers, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, respiratory infections, diabetes, and falls and fractures.

Vitamin D researchers today recommend vitamin D blood levels should be maintained above 40-60 ng/ml. At least 2,000 IU of vitamin D daily in addition to dietary sources and casual solar UV irradiance are required to maintain those levels. According to peer-reviewed, published research, indoor tanners have those levels, but non-tanners do not.


Indoor tanners: 42-49 ng/ml
American average: 23-25 ng/ml

In addition, two 2009 Swedish studies of indoor tanners showed a reduced risk of endometrial cancer and thrombotic events. A recent study at Boston University School of Medicine also found that blood levels of D3 were almost twice as high in sunbed users as in non-users. Sunbed users' bone densities at the hip were also significantly higher.

"There is conclusive evidence that indoor tanning in a non-burning fashion offers a tremendous source of vitamin D," Grant says. "The benefit of regular UV exposure as the body's only true natural source of sufficient vitamin D production easily outweighs the manageable risks associated with overexposure to sunlight," Grant says. "We know now through more than 2,000 papers published in 2009 that smart UV exposure and increased vitamin D levels will not only save lives, but also extend and increase our quality of life."

About Dr. William Grant:

Dr. William Grant is a former NASA PhD and founder and current Director of SUNARC (Sunlight, Nutrition and Health Research Center). SUNARC, www.sunarc.org, is devoted to research, education, and advocacy relating to the prevention of chronic disease through changes in diet and lifestyle. Grant was formerly a senior research scientist in the fields of optical and laser remote sensing of the atmosphere and atmospheric sciences at SRI international, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the NASA Langley Research Center. Grant is author and coauthor of over 70 articles on ultraviolet irradiance and vitamin D and 100 articles on other topics in peer-reviewed journals and has contributed half a dozen chapters to additional books. He was elected fellow of the Optical Society of America in 1992. Dr. Grant is known for publishing the first paper linking diet to Alzheimer's disease, presenting strong evidence that sweeteners are an important risk factor for coronary heart disease for women, and identifying the risk of vitamin D deficiency for ten internal cancers among other ground-breaking research. Grant graduated with a Ph.D. in Physics from U.C. Berkeley.

Source: http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/new-study-by-sunarc-shows,1205000.shtml#

Vitamin D From Sun Exposure Reduces Cancer Risk, Ecological Studies Find

From http://www.cancermonthly.com/iNP/view.asp?ID=244

Getting enough vitamin D can significantly reduce the risk of several different types of cancer, and ecological studies done over the past decade have confirmed that sun exposure is a critical source of this vitamin, according to a recent report in Annals of Epidemiology.

Researchers have been looking at the connection between vitamin D from sunlight and cancer risk since 1980, when researchers Cedric and Frank Garland looked at geographic maps of cancer deaths and found that mortality from colon cancer was highest in places where residents got the least amount of sun exposure (such as in high latitudes).

William B. Grant, PhD., Director of the Sunlight, Nutrition, and Health Research Center (SUNARC) in San Francisco, California, has been one of the foremost researchers on vitamin D and cancer incidence since 2000. In a 2002 study, he identified 14 different types of cancers that were linked to insufficient UVB exposure, and estimated that between 17,000 and 23,000 people die prematurely each year in the U.S. due to a lack of vitamin D from the sun.

The strongest associations between vitamin D from the sun and cancer have been with colon and breast cancers, but links have also been found with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ovarian cancer, and kidney cancer. Studies have also connected vitamin D to a reduced incidence of other diseases, such as colds and flu, coronary heart disease, stroke, and congestive heart failure.

People can get vitamin D in two ways: from the diet (in foods such as salmon, milk, and eggs) and through sunlight exposure (the skin produces vitamin D when exposed to the sun’s UVB rays). Yet diet supplies only about 200 to 300 IU of vitamin D each day; a fraction of the recommended dose for cancer prevention, according to Dr. Grant. “The amount of vitamin D in diet is just not sufficient to have an impact, he says.

The sun is a much more potent source of vitamin D. “In the United States in the summer, people can make 1,500 IU of vitamin D just from casual [sun] exposure,” Dr. Grant says. For people who are relatively young, as little as five to 10 minutes of midday sun exposure without sunscreen is enough to produce the 4,000 IU of vitamin D he recommends daily for disease prevention. Those who are over age 60 may need to spend a few extra minutes outside each day because their bodies don’t produce the vitamin as efficiently.

Despite the mounting evidence that a few minutes of daily sun worshipping is good for the health, dermatologists and cancer investigators have been at odds when it comes to sun advice. For years, dermatologists have been warning Americans to stay out of the sun when possible, and to wear sunscreen when exposed, to avoid developing melanoma—the deadliest form of skin cancer. Yet Dr. Grant says melanomas tend to be caused by UVA rays, which are highest during the morning hours, rather than the cancer-protective UVB rays, which increase at around 1 p.m. “You go out for a shorter time at midday and make your vitamin D, and then cover up,” he advises.

During the winter months or in more northern climates where sun exposure is generally lower, Dr. Grant advises taking vitamin D supplements to ensure that you’re getting enough.

To learn more about getting the optimum levels of vitamin D for your individual situation talk to your licensed healthcare provider.

Source:
Grant WB, Mohr SB. Ecological studies of ultraviolet B, vitamin D and cancer since 2000. Annals of Epidemiology, 2009.

Other sources:
Garland CF, Garland FC. Do sunlight and vitamin D reduce the likelihood of colon cancer? International Journal of Epidemiology. 1980;9:227-231.

Sunbathing 'boosts men's sex drive'

From http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/7127197/Sunbathing-boosts-mens-sex-drive.html

A spot of sunbathing boosts men's sex drive, reveals a new study.

Testosterone levels in men's blood rise accordingly with doses of vitamin D.

The vital nutrient is produced in the body after exposure to sunlight and can also be obtained from eating oily fish and meat.

Researchers at the Medical University of Graz in Austria found men with more vitamin D per millilitre of blood had much more of the main male sexual hormone circulating than those with less.

And the average amount of testosterone over the course of the year was subject to the same fluctuations as the vitamin D level.

Both decrease from October - at the beginning of the winter months - and reach their lowest level in March because of the weaker solar radiation during this period.

Ad Brand, spokesman of the Sunlight Research Forum in Veldhoven in the Netherlands, said: "Men who ensure their body is at least sufficiently supplied with vitamin D are doing good for their testosterone levels and their libido among other things."

The new findings back up previous research that found an hour of sunshine can boost a man's testosterone by 69 percent.

Testosterone is the most important male sexual hormone. In males it is mainly responsible for the development of the sex organs, the formation and maintenance of the typical male sexual characteristics, sperm production and the controlling of male desire.

Stimulated by UV radiation, 90 per cent of vitamin D in the body is produced by the skin. An average vitamin D level of 30 nanograms per millilitre of blood (30 ng/ml) represents the scientific value from which vitamin D has a sufficiently positive effect. Optimal values are between 40 and 60 ng/ml.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Hollywood Tans named Best Tanning Salon 2009 by INsite Magazine


Hollywood Tans was honored by INsite Magazine by being named Best Tanning Salon 2009 (http://www.insiteatlanta.com/bestof2009.asp). The Best of Atlanta awards were apart of the November 2009 edition of INsite. Publishing since 1992, INsite serves as one of the longest running alternative papers in Atlanta.

Is there such a thing as "responsible tanning"?


At Hollywood Tans, we are firm believers in "responsible tanning." Responsible tanning consists of:

1. Moderation: All human activity presents risk, especially if not done in moderation. At Hollywood Tans, we recommend doing everything you can to avoid sunburn. This includes tanning in moderation, avoiding all UV exposure until a sunburn has completely healed, avoiding UV exposure entirely if you are a skin type 1 as per the Fitzpatrick Skin Type Test ("highly sensitive to UV exposure, always burns, never tans"), using SPF when tanning outdoors, and allowing our staff members to determine your exposure time when tanning. For indoor tanning, we recommend you tan only as much as needed to achieve your desired beauty / health goals, no more than once per 24 hours for no longer than the recommended exposure time as determined by your skin type.

2. FDA Regulated Equipment: All of Hollywood Tans' UV tanning equipment is regulated by the FDA and controlled by a computer operated point of sale system that regulates and records all tanning time. As a result, no tanning booth in our salon will exceed the maximum allowed exposure.

3. Parental Consent for Minors: Any customer under the age of 18 who wishes to UV tan will be required to have a parent sign their release form in person.

4. Protective eyewear: As per Georgia and federal requirements, customers must wear approved protective eyewear while tanning indoors. When proper eyewear is not used during the tanning process, the potential for eye injury is greatly increased. Some eye injuries and disorders include Photokeratitis (Cornea Sunburn), Cataracts, Pterygium (Abnormal tissue growth) and damage to the cornea. Towels, scarves or closed eyelids do not adequately protect eyes from ultraviolet exposure.

5. UV-Free Tanning: While we at Hollywood Tans promote responsible UV tanning, we also offer the 100% UV-Free Instant Tan powered by Mystic in each of our salons.